Dental Marketing Reviews is an independent aggregator. We do not sell marketing services, accept payment to influence rankings, or appear on our own list. We autonomously collect publicly available reviews from multiple independent sources and display them without selective filtering or company control.
Sources we pull from
We gather reviews and feedback from:
- Google Business Profile / Google Reviews
- Reddit (dentist communities)
- Glassdoor and Indeed (employee reviews)
- Dental-specific sites and forums
- Trustpilot, Better Business Bureau, and other public platforms
Each agency page notes the sources used. We process only reviews from these external sources. We do not generate, rewrite, or invent reviews.
Why our ratings are often lower (and more reliable)
Many agency websites and reputation tools (including platforms like Birdeye) let companies choose which reviews to display, invite only satisfied clients, or filter out critical feedback. That produces higher scores that reflect a curated sample rather than the full range of experiences.
We do the opposite. We pull from open, multi-source platforms where reviews are not controlled by the agency. We include both client feedback and employee reviews (which often surface issues around communication, turnover, or delivery that client-only ratings miss). We do not allow agencies to remove, edit, or suppress reviews on our site. The result is a more representative, balanced rating. It can be lower than the score shown on an agency’s own site or in a selectively managed widget, because it is not cherry-picked.
How scores work
Published ratings are a straightforward average of the collected reviews. We show the original sources so you can verify the numbers yourself. Employee reviews are labeled separately and are not mixed into the client rating total.
What we do not do
- We do not sell paid placements or ranking upgrades.
- We do not let agencies control which reviews appear.
- We do not selectively invite only positive reviewers.
- We do not remove genuine critical feedback simply because it is negative.
This approach mirrors independent platforms that prioritize breadth and verification over marketing control. Scores here are designed to be transparent and re-derivable from the public sources listed.